linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Set bounds on what /proc/self/make-it-fail accepts.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 19 Feb 2014 13:37:12 -0800 (PST)
From:	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
To:	Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@...il.com>
cc:	Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Set bounds on what /proc/self/make-it-fail accepts.

On Wed, 19 Feb 2014, Akinobu Mita wrote:

> I don't have any plans to extend /proc/self/make-it-fail to support
> other than 0 or 1.  So I have no objection against this change.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@...il.com>
> 

Ok, thanks.  I hoped that the simple_strtol() would have been replaced by 
kstrtoint() since it's the preferred interface to make a lot of this 
simpler and then just test for val == !!val, but the minimal change is 
fine as well.

Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/