| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 10:16:16 +0800 From: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org> To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net> CC: Lan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@...el.com>, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, patches@...aro.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linaro-acpi@...ts.linaro.org, Graeme Gregory <graeme.gregory@...aro.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/5] ACPI / processor_core: Rework _PDC related stuff to make it more arch-independent On 2014年02月19日 08:50, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Wednesday, February 19, 2014 12:23:55 AM Hanjun Guo wrote: >> _PDC related stuff in processor_core.c is little bit X86/IA64 dependent, >> rework the code to make it more arch-independent, no functional change >> in this patch. >> >> Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org> >> Signed-off-by: Graeme Gregory <graeme.gregory@...aro.org> > I've queued up patches [1,3-5/5] from this series for 3.15 (modulo changelog > modifications), but this one should be CCed to the x86 and ia64 maintainers. Thanks! I will resend this patch with Tony and Thomas in cc list, so is there any chance for this patch to be merged into 3.15 if I get acked from them? Best regards Hanjun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists