linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3.10 00/26] 3.10.31-stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 20 Feb 2014 15:30:44 +0800
From:	Xishi Qiu <qiuxishi@...wei.com>
To:	<shuah.kh@...sung.com>
CC:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>,
	<torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	<stable@...r.kernel.org>,
	"shuahkhan@...il.com" <shuahkhan@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.10 00/26] 3.10.31-stable review

On 2014/2/20 8:29, Shuah Khan wrote:

> On 02/18/2014 03:46 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.10.31 release.
>> There are 26 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
>> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
>> let me know.
>>
>> Responses should be made by Thu Feb 20 22:45:20 UTC 2014.
>> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>>
>> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>>     kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.0/stable-review/patch-3.10.31-rc1.gz
>> and the diffstat can be found below.
>>
>> thanks,
>>
>> greg k-h
>>
> 
> Compile and boot tests passed on AMD system. Boot failed on Intel systems. I think the following changes are the suspect, so far by process of elimination - these two aren't in 3.12 and 3.13
> 
> #    modified:   mm/hugetlb.c
> #    modified:   mm/memory-failure.c
> 
> However, my strong suspect is the following:
> 
> Xishi Qiu <qiuxishi@...wei.com>
>     mm: fix process accidentally killed by mce because of huge page migration
> 
> I don't see how this could cause problems, none the less, I will test without these changes and let you know.
> 
> 
> Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>
>     mm/memory-failure.c: fix memory leak in successful soft offlining
> 
> I will test without these changes and let you know.
> 
> -- Shuah
> 

Hi Shuah

I tested on my system, it boot successfully.

hardware: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2420 0 @ 1.90GHz
OS: v3.10.30 + the two patches

Thanks,
Xishi Qiu

> Shuah Khan
> Senior Linux Kernel Developer - Open Source Group
> Samsung Research America(Silicon Valley)
> shuah.kh@...sung.com | (970) 672-0658
> 
> 



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/