linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3.13 00/40] 3.13.4-stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-id: <53054956.4010602@samsung.com>
Date:	Wed, 19 Feb 2014 17:16:22 -0700
From:	Shuah Khan <shuah.kh@...sung.com>
To:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, broonie@...aro.org
Cc:	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	stable@...r.kernel.org, Shuah Khan <shuah.kh@...sung.com>,
	"shuahkhan@...il.com" <shuahkhan@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.13 00/40] 3.13.4-stable review

On 02/18/2014 03:47 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.13.4 release.
> There are 40 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Thu Feb 20 22:44:22 UTC 2014.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.0/stable-review/patch-3.13.4-rc1.gz
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>

Compile tests and boot tests passed.

On Intel systems, there are no dmesg regressions: emerg, crit, alert, 
err are clean. No regressions in warn.

On AMD systems, the following new error messages - suspect is to 
drivers/regulator/core.c - patch

3.13.4 - amd:
 > sdhci-pci 0000:02:00.1: dummy supplies not allowed
 > sdhci-pci 0000:02:00.1: dummy supplies not allowed
drivers/regulator/core.c - patch

Mark Brown <broonie@...aro.org>
     regulator: core: Correct default return value for full constraints

Is this a problem???

-- Shuah

-- 
Shuah Khan
Senior Linux Kernel Developer - Open Source Group
Samsung Research America(Silicon Valley)
shuah.kh@...sung.com | (970) 672-0658
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/