linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH][RESEND] [media] davinci: vpfe: remove deprecated IRQF

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4210530.AR5GZgidVz@avalon>
Date:	Thu, 20 Feb 2014 12:36:57 +0100
From:	Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
To:	Michael Opdenacker <michael.opdenacker@...e-electrons.com>
Cc:	m.chehab@...sung.com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
	prabhakar.csengg@...il.com, yongjun_wei@...ndmicro.com.cn,
	sakari.ailus@....fi, hans.verkuil@...co.com,
	linux-media@...r.kernel.org, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][RESEND] [media] davinci: vpfe: remove deprecated IRQF_DISABLED

Hi Michael,

What's the status of this patch ? Do expect Prabhakar to pick it up, or do you 
plan to push all your IRQF_DISABLED removal patches in one go ?

On Monday 09 December 2013 11:16:22 Michael Opdenacker wrote:
> This patch proposes to remove the use of the IRQF_DISABLED flag
> 
> It's a NOOP since 2.6.35 and it will be removed one day.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Michael Opdenacker <michael.opdenacker@...e-electrons.com>
> Acked-by: Lad, Prabhakar <prabhakar.csengg@...il.com>
> ---
>  drivers/staging/media/davinci_vpfe/vpfe_mc_capture.c | 6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/media/davinci_vpfe/vpfe_mc_capture.c
> b/drivers/staging/media/davinci_vpfe/vpfe_mc_capture.c index
> d8ce20d2fbda..cda8388cbb89 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/media/davinci_vpfe/vpfe_mc_capture.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/media/davinci_vpfe/vpfe_mc_capture.c
> @@ -298,7 +298,7 @@ static int vpfe_attach_irq(struct vpfe_device *vpfe_dev)
> {
>  	int ret = 0;
> 
> -	ret = request_irq(vpfe_dev->ccdc_irq0, vpfe_isr, IRQF_DISABLED,
> +	ret = request_irq(vpfe_dev->ccdc_irq0, vpfe_isr, 0,
>  			  "vpfe_capture0", vpfe_dev);
>  	if (ret < 0) {
>  		v4l2_err(&vpfe_dev->v4l2_dev,
> @@ -306,7 +306,7 @@ static int vpfe_attach_irq(struct vpfe_device *vpfe_dev)
> return ret;
>  	}
> 
> -	ret = request_irq(vpfe_dev->ccdc_irq1, vpfe_vdint1_isr, IRQF_DISABLED,
> +	ret = request_irq(vpfe_dev->ccdc_irq1, vpfe_vdint1_isr, 0,
>  			  "vpfe_capture1", vpfe_dev);
>  	if (ret < 0) {
>  		v4l2_err(&vpfe_dev->v4l2_dev,
> @@ -316,7 +316,7 @@ static int vpfe_attach_irq(struct vpfe_device *vpfe_dev)
> }
> 
>  	ret = request_irq(vpfe_dev->imp_dma_irq, vpfe_imp_dma_isr,
> -			  IRQF_DISABLED, "Imp_Sdram_Irq", vpfe_dev);
> +			  0, "Imp_Sdram_Irq", vpfe_dev);
>  	if (ret < 0) {
>  		v4l2_err(&vpfe_dev->v4l2_dev,
>  			 "Error: requesting IMP IRQ interrupt\n");

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/