[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140220143018.GE6897@htj.dyndns.org>
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2014 09:30:18 -0500
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Li Zefan <lizefan@...wei.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Cgroups <cgroups@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sysfs: fix namespace refcnt leak
Hello, Li.
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 09:39:28AM +0800, Li Zefan wrote:
> > Can we make it optional so that users who don't care about it can
> > ignore it?
>
> cgroupfs also needs this to fix refcnt leak.
Ah, okay.
> Because success in finding an existing cgroup_root doesn't mean no new
> superblock is needed. For example:
>
> # mount -t cgroup -o cpuacct xxx /cgroup
> # mkdir /cgroup/tmp
> # umount /cgroup <--- sb will be freed but cgroup_root won't
>
> // this will allocate new sb, but we find the cgroup_root is there.
> # mount -t cgroup -o cpuacct xxx /cgroup
>
> But debugfs won't need this if it's converted to kernfs.
>
> How about I keep kernfs_mount() API intact, and when this fix gets
> merged into mainline, you merge the fix into cgroup-next, and then
> I make a fix for cgroup by changing kernfs_mount()?
If we need kernfs_mount() modified anyway, let's do it in this patch.
I still think it'd be better to allow the parameter to be NULL but
other than that, no objection.
Thanks!
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists