[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87mwhld72w.fsf@tassilo.jf.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2014 09:31:19 -0800
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@...ne.edu>,
Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: Re: x86_pmu_start WARN_ON.
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> writes:
>
> It will; trace_printk() works without -pg, I think you didn't read the
> instructions very well.
Ok, you enable and disable it again. I won't guess why you do that.
>
> And there's a very good reason not to apply your patch; you can route
> the function tracer into perf, guess what happens when perf calls the
> function tracer again :-)
How?
-Andi
--
ak@...ux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists