[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140220220656.GT17949@sgi.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2014 16:06:57 -0600
From: Russ Anderson <rja@....com>
To: Matthew Garrett <matthew.garrett@...ula.com>
Cc: "lenb@...nel.org" <lenb@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"minyard@....org" <minyard@....org>,
"rjw@...ysocki.net" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
"linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] Change ACPI IPMI support to "default y"
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 09:39:23PM +0000, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-02-20 at 15:28 -0600, Russ Anderson wrote:
>
> > For some customers _any_ amount is significant, especially
> > on large clustered systems where the amount is multiplied
> > by tens or hundreds of thousands of nodes.
> >
> > You many not think wasting their cpu cycles is important, but they do.
>
> Then they should be running locally built kernels in order to ensure
Why don't YOU run a locally built kernel?
> that there's no problematic code running at all. Distribution kernels
> will always contain code that some customers won't be interested in, and
> some of that code will end up executing.
We support multiple distros so if one does something the customer
does not like/need we can steer them to other distros.
> If you have specific bug reports, that would be helpful. But you're not
> describing actual failure conditions or showing any willingness to
> figure out what the underlying problem is.
You can't fix your problem without creating problems for
others to fix?
--
Russ Anderson, Kernel and Performance Software Team Manager
SGI - Silicon Graphics Inc rja@....com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists