lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20140220150508.79bfff95fb5d93c651801ffd@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:	Thu, 20 Feb 2014 15:05:08 +1100
From:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc:	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the mfd-lj tree

Hi Lee,

On Mon, 17 Feb 2014 14:14:46 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 14 Feb 2014 13:42:17 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> >
> > After merging the mfd-lj tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> > allmodconfig) failed like this:
> > 
> > In file included from drivers/mfd/max665x.c:19:0:
> > include/linux/mfd/max665x-private.h:31:1: error: expected ';', identifier or '(' before 'struct'
> >  struct max665x_dev {
> >  ^
> > 
> > Caused by commit e77bb5297293 ("mfd: max665x: Differentiate between
> > MAX665X devices").  Clearly never built by anyone :-(
> > 
> > I have used the mfd-lj tree from next-20140210 again for today (since the
> > other version had other problems).
> 
> Still seeing this error.

Still ...

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@...b.auug.org.au

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ