[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20140220234910.973971325@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2014 15:51:51 -0800
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Jens Axboe <axboe@...com>
Subject: [PATCH 3.10 52/66] block: add cond_resched() to potentially long running ioctl discard loop
3.10-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@...com>
commit c8123f8c9cb517403b51aa41c3c46ff5e10b2c17 upstream.
When mkfs issues a full device discard and the device only
supports discards of a smallish size, we can loop in
blkdev_issue_discard() for a long time. If preempt isn't enabled,
this can turn into a softlock situation and the kernel will
start complaining.
Add an explicit cond_resched() at the end of the loop to avoid
that.
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@...com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
block/blk-lib.c | 8 ++++++++
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
--- a/block/blk-lib.c
+++ b/block/blk-lib.c
@@ -121,6 +121,14 @@ int blkdev_issue_discard(struct block_de
atomic_inc(&bb.done);
submit_bio(type, bio);
+
+ /*
+ * We can loop for a long time in here, if someone does
+ * full device discards (like mkfs). Be nice and allow
+ * us to schedule out to avoid softlocking if preempt
+ * is disabled.
+ */
+ cond_resched();
}
blk_finish_plug(&plug);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists