[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140221150735.GA460@htj.dyndns.org>
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 10:07:35 -0500
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
laijs@...fujitsu.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/9] usb: don't use PREPARE_DELAYED_WORK
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 10:06:05AM -0500, Alan Stern wrote:
> > I think it should be fine to use INIT_DELAYED_WORK(), but Alan would
> > know best. Alan?
>
> That's right; INIT_DELAYED_WORK() should be fine. Provided there's no
> problem doing it from within the previous work routine.
Yeah, that's completely fine. Once a work item starts execution,
workqueue doesn't care about it at all - even freeing and recycling it
is fine.
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists