linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 09/21] perf, c2c: Add rbtree sorted on mmap2 data

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140221165928.GB1121@krava.brq.redhat.com>
Date:	Fri, 21 Feb 2014 17:59:28 +0100
From:	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To:	Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com>
Cc:	acme@...stprotocols.net, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	jmario@...hat.com, fowles@...each.com, eranian@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/21] perf, c2c: Add rbtree sorted on mmap2 data

On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 09:45:53PM -0500, Don Zickus wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 02:04:05PM +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 12:29:04PM -0500, Don Zickus wrote:

SNIP

> > > +
> > > +		if (l > r) return 1;
> > > +		if (l < r) return -1;
> > > +
> > > +		/* sorting by iaddr makes calculations easier later */
> > > +		if (left->mi->iaddr.al_addr > right->mi->iaddr.al_addr) return 1;
> > > +		if (left->mi->iaddr.al_addr < right->mi->iaddr.al_addr) return -1;
> > > +	}
> > > +
> > > +	return 0;
> > > +}
> > 
> > there's sort object doing exatly this over hist_entry's
> > 
> > Is there any reason not to use hist_entries?
> 
> So looking over hist_entry, I realize, what do I gain?  I implemented it
> and realized I had to add, 'cpumode', 'tid' and a 'private' field to
> struct hist_entry.  Then because I have my own report implementation, I
> still have to copy and paste a ton of stuff from builtin-report over to
> here (including callchain support).

you mean new sort_entry objects?

> 
> Not unless you are expecting me to add giant chunks of code to
> builtin-report.c?

it can be separated object, implementing new report iterator

I think that we should go on with existing sort code we have..
but I understand you might need some special usage.. i'll dive
in and try to find some answer ;-)

jirka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/