linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ARM: EDMA: Use platform_get

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <53078E9B.5010806@ti.com>
Date:	Fri, 21 Feb 2014 11:36:27 -0600
From:	Joel Fernandes <joelf@...com>
To:	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
CC:	Linux OMAP List <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux ARM Kernel List <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"nsekhar@...com" <nsekhar@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: EDMA: Use platform_get_resource functions for DT

On 02/21/2014 06:15 AM, Mark Rutland wrote:
>> Also, while at it get rid of the assumption in the code that "CC" is at reg
>> index 0 in the DT and xbar is at offset 1. Instead use reg-names to get the
>> memory resource in concern keeping things much cleaner and simpler. This also
>> makes it possible to have multiple channel controllers.
> 
> While this is nice I think we have to have a fallback to the existing
> behaviour if there's no reg-names property present, unless we know for
> certain no-one is possibly using an existing DTB.

Yes, its true it break existing DTBs but currently only 2 TI SoCs use EDMA this
way, the vast majority of EDMA users are yet to follow where we can do it right.
 Further, the old bindings are really limiting specially the 2 CC case and if
additionally memory maps are used in the future. So keeping the old binding is
limiting in this regard.

Here is what the platform_data used to look like when used by mach-davinci:

static struct resource da850_edma_resources[] = {
        {
                .name   = "edma_cc0",
                .start  = DA8XX_TPCC_BASE,
                .end    = DA8XX_TPCC_BASE + SZ_32K - 1,
                .flags  = IORESOURCE_MEM,
        },
        {
                .name   = "edma_tc0",
                .start  = DA8XX_TPTC0_BASE,
                .end    = DA8XX_TPTC0_BASE + SZ_1K - 1,
                .flags  = IORESOURCE_MEM,
        },
        {
                .name   = "edma_tc1",
                .start  = DA8XX_TPTC1_BASE,
                .end    = DA8XX_TPTC1_BASE + SZ_1K - 1,
                .flags  = IORESOURCE_MEM,
        },
        {
                .name   = "edma_cc1",
                .start  = DA850_TPCC1_BASE,
                .end    = DA850_TPCC1_BASE + SZ_32K - 1,
                .flags  = IORESOURCE_MEM,
        },

As you can see, there are several memory maps and different interpretations.
Considering this, IMO- it makes sense to pay a small price to keep the semantics
sane.

On the other hand, the other 2 options are:
1. We add a fallback if reg-names look up fails.
2. We inject reg-names property into edma DT nodes that don't have them, and
make sure all future dtsi with edma nodes mention the reg-names property.

These 2 are a bit error prone though, for example if someone deliberately
forgets to mention reg-names, and the code still works, but misbehaves in some way.

Regards,
-Joel

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/