[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <53079173.3030305@wwwdotorg.org>
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 10:48:35 -0700
From: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
To: Markus Mayer <markus.mayer@...aro.org>,
Matt Porter <mporter@...aro.org>
CC: Christian Daudt <bcm@...thebug.org>,
ARM Kernel List <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: bcm2835: Move to mach-bcm directory
On 02/21/2014 10:41 AM, Markus Mayer wrote:
> On 21 February 2014 06:09, Matt Porter <mporter@...aro.org> wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 09:53:56PM -0700, Stephen Warren wrote:
>>> On 02/20/2014 05:16 PM, Markus Mayer wrote:
>>>> Move the bcm2835 board file into the mach-bcm directory. This allows us
>>>> to get rid of the mach-bcm2835 directory with the associated Kconfig
>>>> and Makefile.
>>>
>>> This looks fine, although it needs a small patch to bcm2835_defconfig
>>> squashed in, which I'll post in a second.
>>>
>>> Do you want me to take it through the bcm2835 tree? That's probably
>>> easiest to avoid conflicts with any other bcm2835 patches, not that it's
>>> too likely there will be any to the board file.
>>
>> That's ok with me. Be aware that we may have minor Kconfig/Makefile
>> conflicts between the bcm2835 tree and the mach-bcm tree since we just
>> queued the bcm5301x support.
>
> Matt, will you squash Stephen's patch into mine when you take the
> patches or should I submit a v2 of the patch that combines both?
I think Matt said it was OK to take them through the bcm2835 tree. I'll
squash them together; no need to repost.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists