[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140221182424.GA5751@arm.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 18:24:24 +0000
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Cc: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>,
Lan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@...el.com>,
Graeme Gregory <graeme.gregory@...aro.org>, patches@...aro.org,
linaro-acpi@...ts.linaro.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/5] ACPI / processor_core: Rework _PDC related
stuff to make it more arch-independent
Hi Rafael,
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 01:50:22AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Wednesday, February 19, 2014 12:23:55 AM Hanjun Guo wrote:
> > _PDC related stuff in processor_core.c is little bit X86/IA64 dependent,
> > rework the code to make it more arch-independent, no functional change
> > in this patch.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Graeme Gregory <graeme.gregory@...aro.org>
>
> I've queued up patches [1,3-5/5] from this series for 3.15 (modulo changelog
> modifications), but this one should be CCed to the x86 and ia64 maintainers.
Thanks for taking these patches. I would however hold onto patch 3/5 as
this is still under discussion. Basically for patches specific to ARM
ACPI I would really like to see more acks before being merged as that's
a new thing for us.
Thanks.
--
Catalin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists