[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20140221121627.19e5d04dbba25984d4be8a15@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 12:16:27 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>,
Mike Frysinger <vapier@...too.org>,
Kyungsik Lee <kyungsik.lee@....com>,
Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>, Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>,
Dwight Engen <dwight.engen@...cle.com>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs, kernel: Support disabling the uselib syscall
On Fri, 21 Feb 2014 10:11:06 -0800 Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org> wrote:
> uselib hasn't been used since libc5; glibc does not use it. Support
> turning it off.
>
> When disabled, also omit the load_elf_library implementation from
> binfmt_elf.c, which only uselib invokes.
>
> bloat-o-meter:
> add/remove: 0/4 grow/shrink: 0/1 up/down: 0/-785 (-785)
> function old new delta
> padzero 39 36 -3
> uselib_flags 20 - -20
> sys_uselib 168 - -168
> SyS_uselib 168 - -168
> load_elf_library 426 - -426
>
The patch disables CONFIG_USELIB by default. This important decision
should be mentioned and justified in the changelog, please.
> +#ifdef CONFIG_USELIB
I wonder if CONFIG_SYS_USELIB would be a better identifier. We haven't
done anything consistent here.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists