[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5308C343.5040102@linux.intel.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2014 23:33:23 +0800
From: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...ux.intel.com>
To: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
CC: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Donald Dutile <ddutile@...hat.com>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@...akpoint.cc>,
"stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 10/33] iommu, irq: Allocate irq_desc for dmar_msi with
local node
Hi Yinghai,
I have a plan to test this patch set once I have reviewed
all patches in coming weeks. Do you have a plan to update to latest
kernel or is it ok to test this version?
Thanks!
Gerry
On 2014/2/22 15:44, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 7:14 PM, Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>
>> Seems there is no such protection on IA64 side. I feel create_irq_nr()
>> returns 0 for error is a little risky, 0 may be
>> a valid IRQ number on other platforms(no sure about this).
>> Thanks!
>
> in [PATCH] ia64, irq: Add dummy create_irq_nr()
>
> +unsigned int create_irq_nr(unsigned int from, int node)
> +{
> + int irq = create_irq();
> +
> + if (irq < 0)
> + irq = 0;
> +
> + return irq;
> +}
> +
>
> so that from is ignored.
>
> create_irq_nr() is only with x86 and ia64.
>
> Thanks
>
> Yinghai
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists