| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <tip-c9b951c4d12f0b2e9a07dd459c554bc05628d092@git.kernel.org>
Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2014 09:58:51 -0800
From: tip-bot for Jiri Olsa <tipbot@...or.com>
To: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc: acme@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, paulus@...ba.org,
hpa@...or.com, mingo@...nel.org, a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl,
jean.pihet@...aro.org, namhyung@...nel.org, jolsa@...hat.com,
fweisbec@...il.com, dsahern@...il.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
cjashfor@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: [tip:perf/core] perf callchain:
Separate perf_reg_value function in perf_regs object
Commit-ID: c9b951c4d12f0b2e9a07dd459c554bc05628d092
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/c9b951c4d12f0b2e9a07dd459c554bc05628d092
Author: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
AuthorDate: Tue, 7 Jan 2014 13:47:29 +0100
Committer: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
CommitDate: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 09:34:49 -0300
perf callchain: Separate perf_reg_value function in perf_regs object
Making perf_reg_value function global (formely reg_value), because it's
going to be used globaly across all code providing the dwarf post unwind
feature.
Changing its prototype to be generic:
-int reg_value(unw_word_t *valp, struct regs_dump *regs, int id)
+int perf_reg_value(u64 *valp, struct regs_dump *regs, int id);
Changing the valp type from libunwind specific 'unw_word_t' to u64.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Acked-by: Jean Pihet <jean.pihet@...aro.org>
Cc: Corey Ashford <cjashfor@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: Jean Pihet <jean.pihet@...aro.org>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1389098853-14466-13-git-send-email-jolsa@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
---
tools/perf/Makefile.perf | 1 +
tools/perf/util/perf_regs.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
tools/perf/util/perf_regs.h | 13 +++++++++++++
tools/perf/util/unwind-libunwind.c | 38 ++++++++++++--------------------------
4 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/perf/Makefile.perf b/tools/perf/Makefile.perf
index 9ef6b33..f99a392 100644
--- a/tools/perf/Makefile.perf
+++ b/tools/perf/Makefile.perf
@@ -538,6 +538,7 @@ ifeq ($(NO_PERF_REGS),0)
ifeq ($(ARCH),x86)
LIB_H += arch/x86/include/perf_regs.h
endif
+ LIB_OBJS += $(OUTPUT)util/perf_regs.o
endif
ifndef NO_LIBNUMA
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/perf_regs.c b/tools/perf/util/perf_regs.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..a3539ef
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/perf/util/perf_regs.c
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+#include <errno.h>
+#include "perf_regs.h"
+
+int perf_reg_value(u64 *valp, struct regs_dump *regs, int id)
+{
+ int i, idx = 0;
+ u64 mask = regs->mask;
+
+ if (!(mask & (1 << id)))
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < id; i++) {
+ if (mask & (1 << i))
+ idx++;
+ }
+
+ *valp = regs->regs[idx];
+ return 0;
+}
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/perf_regs.h b/tools/perf/util/perf_regs.h
index a3d42cd..d6e8b6a 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/perf_regs.h
+++ b/tools/perf/util/perf_regs.h
@@ -1,8 +1,14 @@
#ifndef __PERF_REGS_H
#define __PERF_REGS_H
+#include "types.h"
+#include "event.h"
+
#ifdef HAVE_PERF_REGS_SUPPORT
#include <perf_regs.h>
+
+int perf_reg_value(u64 *valp, struct regs_dump *regs, int id);
+
#else
#define PERF_REGS_MASK 0
@@ -10,5 +16,12 @@ static inline const char *perf_reg_name(int id __maybe_unused)
{
return NULL;
}
+
+static inline int perf_reg_value(u64 *valp __maybe_unused,
+ struct regs_dump *regs __maybe_unused,
+ int id __maybe_unused)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
#endif /* HAVE_PERF_REGS_SUPPORT */
#endif /* __PERF_REGS_H */
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/unwind-libunwind.c b/tools/perf/util/unwind-libunwind.c
index 79dbfbb..bd5768d 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/unwind-libunwind.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/unwind-libunwind.c
@@ -390,30 +390,13 @@ static int access_dso_mem(struct unwind_info *ui, unw_word_t addr,
return !(size == sizeof(*data));
}
-static int reg_value(unw_word_t *valp, struct regs_dump *regs, int id)
-{
- int i, idx = 0;
- u64 mask = regs->mask;
-
- if (!(mask & (1 << id)))
- return -EINVAL;
-
- for (i = 0; i < id; i++) {
- if (mask & (1 << i))
- idx++;
- }
-
- *valp = regs->regs[idx];
- return 0;
-}
-
static int access_mem(unw_addr_space_t __maybe_unused as,
unw_word_t addr, unw_word_t *valp,
int __write, void *arg)
{
struct unwind_info *ui = arg;
struct stack_dump *stack = &ui->sample->user_stack;
- unw_word_t start, end;
+ u64 start, end;
int offset;
int ret;
@@ -423,7 +406,7 @@ static int access_mem(unw_addr_space_t __maybe_unused as,
return 0;
}
- ret = reg_value(&start, &ui->sample->user_regs, PERF_REG_SP);
+ ret = perf_reg_value(&start, &ui->sample->user_regs, PERF_REG_SP);
if (ret)
return ret;
@@ -436,8 +419,9 @@ static int access_mem(unw_addr_space_t __maybe_unused as,
if (addr < start || addr + sizeof(unw_word_t) >= end) {
ret = access_dso_mem(ui, addr, valp);
if (ret) {
- pr_debug("unwind: access_mem %p not inside range %p-%p\n",
- (void *)addr, (void *)start, (void *)end);
+ pr_debug("unwind: access_mem %p not inside range"
+ " 0x%" PRIx64 "-0x%" PRIx64 "\n",
+ (void *) addr, start, end);
*valp = 0;
return ret;
}
@@ -446,8 +430,8 @@ static int access_mem(unw_addr_space_t __maybe_unused as,
offset = addr - start;
*valp = *(unw_word_t *)&stack->data[offset];
- pr_debug("unwind: access_mem addr %p, val %lx, offset %d\n",
- (void *)addr, (unsigned long)*valp, offset);
+ pr_debug("unwind: access_mem addr %p val %lx, offset %d\n",
+ (void *) addr, (unsigned long)*valp, offset);
return 0;
}
@@ -457,6 +441,7 @@ static int access_reg(unw_addr_space_t __maybe_unused as,
{
struct unwind_info *ui = arg;
int id, ret;
+ u64 val;
/* Don't support write, I suspect we don't need it. */
if (__write) {
@@ -473,12 +458,13 @@ static int access_reg(unw_addr_space_t __maybe_unused as,
if (id < 0)
return -EINVAL;
- ret = reg_value(valp, &ui->sample->user_regs, id);
+ ret = perf_reg_value(&val, &ui->sample->user_regs, id);
if (ret) {
pr_err("unwind: can't read reg %d\n", regnum);
return ret;
}
+ *valp = (unw_word_t) val;
pr_debug("unwind: reg %d, val %lx\n", regnum, (unsigned long)*valp);
return 0;
}
@@ -572,7 +558,7 @@ int unwind__get_entries(unwind_entry_cb_t cb, void *arg,
struct machine *machine, struct thread *thread,
struct perf_sample *data, int max_stack)
{
- unw_word_t ip;
+ u64 ip;
struct unwind_info ui = {
.sample = data,
.thread = thread,
@@ -583,7 +569,7 @@ int unwind__get_entries(unwind_entry_cb_t cb, void *arg,
if (!data->user_regs.regs)
return -EINVAL;
- ret = reg_value(&ip, &data->user_regs, PERF_REG_IP);
+ ret = perf_reg_value(&ip, &data->user_regs, PERF_REG_IP);
if (ret)
return ret;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists