linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 3/3] qspinlock, x86: Add x86 specific optimization for 2 contending tasks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5307FF0B.50100@hp.com>
Date:	Fri, 21 Feb 2014 20:36:11 -0500
From:	Waiman Long <waiman.long@...com>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
CC:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Michel Lespinasse <walken@...gle.com>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	George Spelvin <linux@...izon.com>,
	Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>,
	Daniel J Blueman <daniel@...ascale.com>,
	Alexander Fyodorov <halcy@...dex.ru>,
	Aswin Chandramouleeswaran <aswin@...com>,
	Scott J Norton <scott.norton@...com>,
	Thavatchai Makphaibulchoke <thavatchai.makpahibulchoke@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/3] qspinlock, x86: Add x86 specific optimization
 for 2 contending tasks

On 02/21/2014 12:26 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 12:09:57PM -0500, Waiman Long wrote:
>> On 02/21/2014 12:08 PM, Waiman Long wrote:
>>> On 02/21/2014 07:12 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>>>> Why is this x86 only code?
>>> The code is making use of the fact that byte write is atomic which is true
>>> in x86 and probably in a few other architectures. I could pull these codes
>>> into the generic qspinlock.c file and set a flag in the asm header file to
>>> activate it if it is what you want.
>>>
>>> -Longman
>> BTW, I also assume that 8-bit and 16-bit cmpxchg() and xchg() are available.
> Right, screw Alpha :-) Just pull it into the generic code; its far too
> much code to replicate per arch.

OK, I will do that in the next version.

-Longman
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/