linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/4] hugetlb: add hugepages

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1393043471.2473.0.camel@buesod1.americas.hpqcorp.net>
Date:	Fri, 21 Feb 2014 20:31:11 -0800
From:	Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr@...com>
To:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
	Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@...hat.com>, mtosatti@...hat.com,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
	isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com, yinghai@...nel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] hugetlb: add hugepages_node= command-line option

On Sat, 2014-02-22 at 05:03 +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > But I think it would be better if it made hugepages= and hugepagesz=
> > obsolete, so we can emit a printk if people use those, telling them
> > to migrate because the old options are going away.
> 
> Not sure why everyone wants to break existing systems. These options
> have existed for many years, you cannot not just remove them.
> 
> Also the old options are totally fine and work adequately for the
> vast majority of users who do not need to control node assignment
> fine grained.

Yes, please, why can't both options just coexist.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/