[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140222085030.GA26794@dhcp-26-207.brq.redhat.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2014 09:50:31 +0100
From: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...hat.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Gleb Natapov <gleb@...nel.org>,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] kvm: Use pci_enable_msix_exact() instead of
pci_enable_msix()
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 10:36:25PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 21/02/2014 19:56, Alexander Gordeev ha scritto:
> >On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 06:11:29PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> >>It's okay, but it's not clear to me whether I should include this
> >>patch or someone else will. :)
> >
> >Please, include it.
>
> And where do I get pci_enable_msix_exact? When will pci_enable_msix
> disappear?
Commit d158fc7 ("Merge tag 'pci-v3.14-fixes-1'") in Linus's tree has it.
pci_enable_msix() is going to be removed once all drivers updated with
new interface.
> So, do I have to pull something (which I'd rather not, since pulling
> the wrong thing in a submaintainer tree will make Linus angry), or
> should I do it in the next merge window after pci_enable_msix_exact
> gets in?
So it is already in.
> All in all, it seems much simpler to me if the linux-pci tree just
> includes the whole patch series with my Acked-by.
>
> Paolo
>
> >Thanks!
> >
> >>Paolo
> >
>
--
Regards,
Alexander Gordeev
agordeev@...hat.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists