[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140224012421.GO25940@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 10:24:21 +0900
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Cc: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, sameo@...ux.intel.com,
lee.jones@...aro.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
patches@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] regmap: Add API call apply but not register a patch
file
On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 04:11:59PM +0000, Charles Keepax wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 11:10:48AM +0900, Mark Brown wrote:
> > This is just regmap_multi_reg_write() I think? That already exists, the
> > theory was that we're going to get an optimised version of that for some
> > hardware which can stream things and cut out some overheads though that
> > doesn't seem to have materialised yet.
> I had missed regmap_multi_reg_write but the difference here is that we
> apply cache bypass, and that the cache bypass is only applied whilst the
> regmap lock is held. This allows users to be sure that no writes
> from other threads will accidentally have the bypass applied to them.
Right, OK - but it should still be a wrapper for a core implementation
and share interface/naming.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists