linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3.11 085/121] tty: Set correct tty name in 'active' sysfs attribute

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 24 Feb 2014 09:54:10 +0000
From:	Luís Henriques <luis.henriques@...onical.com>
To:	David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@...il.com>
Cc:	Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...oraproject.org>,
	Ray Strode <halfline@...il.com>,
	"Linux-Kernel@...r. Kernel. Org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
	Ubuntu kernel team <kernel-team@...ts.ubuntu.com>,
	Lennart Poettering <lennart@...ttering.net>,
	Kay Sievers <kay@...y.org>, Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>,
	Werner Fink <werner@...e.de>, Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.11 085/121] tty: Set correct tty name in 'active' sysfs
 attribute

On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 09:09:22PM +0100, David Herrmann wrote:
> Hi
> 
> On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 3:46 PM, Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...oraproject.org> wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 9:37 AM, Ray Strode <halfline@...il.com> wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> This broke plymouth, i think.  Plymouth used the herustic:
> >> "/sys/class/tty/console/active contains something other than tty0" to
> >> mean "probably has serial consoles, force verbose messages instead of
> >> a splash screen".  Now on a normal system it contains tty1.
> >>
> >> I pushed a commit to plymouth that gets it working again, but it could
> >> cause compatiblity concerns if new kernels are pushed to old releases.
> >
> > Hm.  Breaking userspace is probably a bad thing here.
> >
> > Greg, you have this queued for 3.13.5 at the moment.  Maybe we should
> > hold off on this one until this discussion is sorted out?
> 
> Looks like a broken patch, not a broken idea. So you should probably
> hold off on this one till we figure it out. See Kay's comment on
> Greg's series for more.
> 
> Thanks
> David

I'll just drop this patch from the 3.11 kernel.  Thank you all!

Cheers,
--
Luís
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/