[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <530B1B80.4000307@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 18:14:24 +0800
From: Michael wang <wangyun@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
CC: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: sched: hang in migrate_swap
On 02/24/2014 03:10 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 01:19:15PM +0800, Michael wang wrote:
>> Peter, do we accidentally missed this commit?
>>
>> http://git.kernel.org/tip/477af336ba06ef4c32e97892bb0d2027ce30f466
>
> Ingo dropped it on Saturday because it makes locking_selftest() unhappy.
>
> That is because we call locking_selftest() way before we're ready to
> call schedule() and guess what it does :-/
>
> I'm not entirely sure what to do.. ideally I'd shoot locking_selftest in
> the head, but clearly that's not entirely desired either.
...what about move idle_balance() back to it's old position?
pull_rt_task() logical could be after idle_balance() if still no FAIR
and DL, then go into the pick loop, that may could make things more
clean & clear, should we have a try?
Regards,
Michael Wang
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists