[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1393238832-9100-1-git-send-email-juri.lelli@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 11:47:12 +0100
From: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...il.com>
To: mingo@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org, tglx@...utronix.de
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com,
konrad.wilk@...cle.com, rostedt@...dmis.org,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH] sched/deadline: Switch CPU's presence test order
Commit 82b9580 (sched/deadline: Test for CPU's presence explicitly)
changed how we check if a CPU returned by cpudeadline machinery is
valid. But, we don't want to call cpu_present() if best_cpu is
equal to -1. So, switch the order of tests inside WARN_ON().
Signed-off-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...il.com>
---
kernel/sched/cpudeadline.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/cpudeadline.c b/kernel/sched/cpudeadline.c
index 5b8838b..5b9bb42 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/cpudeadline.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/cpudeadline.c
@@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ static void cpudl_heapify(struct cpudl *cp, int idx)
static void cpudl_change_key(struct cpudl *cp, int idx, u64 new_dl)
{
- WARN_ON(!cpu_present(idx) || idx == IDX_INVALID);
+ WARN_ON(idx == IDX_INVALID || !cpu_present(idx));
if (dl_time_before(new_dl, cp->elements[idx].dl)) {
cp->elements[idx].dl = new_dl;
@@ -117,7 +117,7 @@ int cpudl_find(struct cpudl *cp, struct task_struct *p,
}
out:
- WARN_ON(!cpu_present(best_cpu) && best_cpu != -1);
+ WARN_ON(best_cpu != -1 && !cpu_present(best_cpu));
return best_cpu;
}
--
1.7.9.5
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists