[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140224104634.GA2553@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 10:46:35 +0000
From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
To: Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@...ne.edu>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Chad Paradis <chad.paradis@...t.maine.edu>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [patch/rfc] perf on raspberry-pi without overflow interrupt
Hi Vince,
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 05:45:04AM +0000, Vince Weaver wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Jan 2014, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> > Yeah I suppose we could do something like that. Maybe something like:
> >
> > # cat /sys/bus/event_source/devices/cpu/flags
> > int precise filter
>
> wouldn't that violate the "one value per file" rule?
>
> I guess we could also stick it in the mmap page somewhere, as tools like
> PAPI already have to check there for things like rdpmc support.
>
>
> Anyway, here's a first pass at a generic fix for this issue. I'm sure the
> code is pretty horrible, I don't usually mess with the perf code at this
> level. I haven't tested yet as it touched enough files that the rasp-pi
> is going to take a few hours to finish compiling.
>
> Am I on the right track, or totally off here?
Where did we get to with this? If the generic changes are going to take some
time, I'm happy to take a temporary (non-invasive) fix in the ARM backend while
you sort out the core.
Will
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists