linux-kernel - Re: kernfs/rtc: circular dependency between kernfs and ops

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 24 Feb 2014 12:04:27 +0100
From:	Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>
To:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc:	Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
	rtc-linux@...glegroups.com, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: kernfs/rtc: circular dependency between kernfs and ops_lock

On Sat, 22 Feb 2014 15:52:17 -0500
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org> wrote:

> The problem is rtc_device_unregister().  It grabs rtc->ops_lock and
> then tries to remove the sysfs files.  Some of those sysfs file
> implementations acquire rtc->ops_lock, so it of course can lead to
> deadlocks.  One can't try to delete a sysfs file which acquires a lock
> while holding the same lock.

 Pretty interesting indeed. One option would be to remove
 the sys files before acquiring the lock. But I wonder
 if this could lead to other issues.

-- 

 Best regards,

 Alessandro Zummo,
  Tower Technologies - Torino, Italy

  http://www.towertech.it

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/