linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/6] android: convert sync to fence api, v4

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <530B4299.3090508@canonical.com>
Date:	Mon, 24 Feb 2014 14:01:13 +0100
From:	Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...onical.com>
To:	Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@...are.com>
CC:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
	dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org,
	ccross@...gle.com, linux-media@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] android: convert sync to fence api, v4

op 19-02-14 14:56, Thomas Hellstrom schreef:
>> >+static void fence_check_cb_func(struct fence *f, struct fence_cb *cb)
>> >+{
>> >+	struct sync_fence_cb *check = container_of(cb, struct sync_fence_cb, cb);
>> >+	struct sync_fence *fence = check->fence;
>> >+
>> >+	// TODO: Add a fence->status member and check it
> Hmm, C++ / C99 style comments makes checkpatch.pl complain. Did you run
> this series through checkpatch?
>
> /Thomas
>
Actually I used c99 here because it shouldn't have been in the sent patch. ;-)

Right below that comment I use fence->status, so the right thing to do was to zap the comment.

Thanks for catching it!

~Maarten\
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/