| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <530AAA38.3090700@iki.fi> Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 04:11:04 +0200 From: Anssi Hannula <anssi.hannula@....fi> To: Michal Malý <madcatxster@...fuk.cz> CC: linux-input@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dmitry.torokhov@...il.com, elias.vds@...il.com, jkosina@...e.cz, simon@...gewell.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] Add ff-memless-next driver 24.02.2014 03:54, Michal Malý kirjoitti: > I forgot to comment on this: >> Stopped effects should still be able to be updated. > Fair enough. I could not find a definitive answer to what is expected behavior > in this case. As far as I can tell, there are following cases: > - Effects with no duration and delay: they shall be updated right away. > - Effects with delay: updated parameters shall be sent to the device at the > correct time. > - "Expired" effects with finite duration - ??? I assumed that effects with > finite duration that have already finished playing cannot be updated because > it does not seem to make much sense to do so. "Expired" effects can always be played back again later - if that happens, the updated parameters will be in effect. > Shall such an effect be > restarted when it is updated? No. > Is there any guideline I should stick to I am > not aware of? Only "3.7 Dynamic update of an effect" of input/ff.txt. -- Anssi Hannula -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists