[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <530AB0CD.6090602@hitachi.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 11:39:09 +0900
From: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
mingo@...nel.org
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, x86@...nel.org,
fche@...hat.com, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip 0/2] kprobes/x86: Fix bugs for NMI handling
Hi Ingo,
Should I resend this series to your kernel.org address?
Thank you,
(2014/02/20 12:39), Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> The following series fixes bugs hidden in the ancient code.
>
> The bugs suddenly appeared when I enabled over 6,000 kprobes
> and ran perf-top with --call-graph. The bugs are hidden in
> the old code and it have woken up by real stress testing.
>
> Actually, current kprobes doesn't expect an NMI handler
> hits in single-stepping state (including preparation and
> do_debug() handling). Moreover, the NMI handler causing
> a page fault by trying to access user pages, is out of
> imagination! :) But perf does it.
>
> Thus the previous code optimistically check the current
> running kprobe state, and if it is in the singlestep state,
> it changes the IP address to probed address and return,
> because it expects the page fault happened on the single
> stepped code.
> However, in fact, the perf's NMI can interrupt the
> do_debug or somewhere around that and it may cause a
> page fault. In this case, putting the IP address to
> probed address is simply wrong. It causes unexpected
> kernel crash.
> To handle this correctly, this patch fixes it to ensure
> the page-fault address is actually same to the single-
> stepping address, and only if so, set the IP address
> to the probed address.
>
> I also found another small mistake which gives up the
> recovery from reentered kprobes in single-stepping state,
> but it also assumes that there is no NMI handler interrupts
> in that state. It should gives up only when the nested
> reentering happens.
>
> Thanks to Ingo and Frank for encouraging me to start
> stress testing with massive multiple kprobes. :)
>
> Thank you,
>
> ---
>
> Masami Hiramatsu (2):
> [BUGFIX]kprobes/x86: Fix page-fault handling logic
> kprobes/x86: Allow to handle reentered kprobe on singlestepping
>
>
> arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c | 16 ++++++----------
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> --
> Signature
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
>
--
Masami HIRAMATSU
IT Management Research Dept. Linux Technology Center
Hitachi, Ltd., Yokohama Research Laboratory
E-mail: masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists