lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 07:51:42 -0800 From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com> To: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> CC: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the tip tree static asmlinkage can make sense if a pointer to the function is taken somewhere in the same translation unit. On February 24, 2014 7:48:41 AM PST, Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com> wrote: >> I guess that there may be more places where "asmlinkage" is used with >> "static" - I assume that they are all incorrect? > >Likely they are bogus yes. > >One issue is still the changed ABI on i386, so one has to double check >before removing if they have arguments. > >-Andi -- Sent from my mobile phone. Please pardon brevity and lack of formatting. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists