[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <530AB4D3.4090103@realtek.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 10:56:19 +0800
From: Roger <rogerable@...ltek.com>
To: Chris Ball <chris@...ntf.net>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@...il.com>,
Alex Dubov <oakad@...oo.com>,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
<driverdev-devel@...uxdriverproject.org>,
<wei_wang@...lsil.com.cn>, <micky_ching@...lsil.com.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] mfd: Add realtek USB card reader driver
On 02/17/2014 08:03 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
>>>>>>>> From: Roger Tseng <rogerable@...ltek.com>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Realtek USB card reader provides a channel to transfer command or data to flash
>>>>>>>> memory cards. This driver exports host instances for mmc and memstick subsystems
>>>>>>>> and handles basic works.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Roger Tseng <rogerable@...ltek.com>
>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>> drivers/mfd/Kconfig | 10 +
>>>>>>>> drivers/mfd/Makefile | 1 +
>>>>>>>> drivers/mfd/rtsx_usb.c | 760 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>>>> include/linux/mfd/rtsx_usb.h | 628 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>>>> 4 files changed, 1399 insertions(+)
>>>>>>>> create mode 100644 drivers/mfd/rtsx_usb.c
>>>>>>>> create mode 100644 include/linux/mfd/rtsx_usb.h
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Applied again, thanks.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Would you also apply patch 2/3 and 3/3 that to make the device fully
>>>>>> operational for users? Or should they be applied by maintainers of
>>>>>> mmc/memstick subsystems?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Chris, would you give some comment?
>>>>>
>>>>> I can apply them, but I need the other Maintainer Acks.
>>>>>
>>>>> If they are build orthogonal i.e. there are no build dependencies
>>>>> between them, it's probably better that they go into their associated
>>>>> trees separately.
>>>>>
>>>> I think it would be better to apply them together since the later
>>>> patches really depend on the 1st one,so now we are waiting for Acks
>>> >from mmc/memstick subsystems.
>>>
>>> When you say "depend on", do you mean as a build depenency, or won't
>>> run without the first patch applied?
>>
>> The later 2 patches actually invoke symbols defined in the first
>> patch and won't compile if it is not applied first. The Kconfig
>> changes for the later oness also specified this by "depends on".
>>
>> I'm not sure if this means "build dependency". Sorry for my unclear words.
>
> Yes, that sounds like a build dependency i.e. will not build without
> errors or warnings without the previous patch applied.
>
>>>> But there is no one specified for "memstick/host/" in MAINTAINERS.
>>>> Could anyone else Ack this?
>
> Andrew (CC'ed) has been Acking these thus far.
>
Hi Chris and Andrew,
Would you please help comment PATCH 2/3 and 3/3 (for mmc and memstick,
respectively) or give Acks? Thus we can proceed with applying or
revision if necessary.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists