[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <530BC209.2000708@ti.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 17:04:57 -0500
From: Tom Rini <trini@...com>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
CC: Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] checkpatch.pl: Add warning for new __packed additions
On 02/24/2014 05:02 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Mon, 2014-02-24 at 16:52 -0500, Tom Rini wrote:
>> I've been lead to
>> believe that most cases now people should be using regmap instead, which
>> just leaves the case of having to match on-disk formats or similar cases
>> I believe as the things that must stay __packed.
>
> __packed is also necessary for on-wire networking protocols.
Indeed, and there's probably a few other valid cases I'm also
forgetting. But the common case is hardware, where regmap is now preferred.
I've got this modified to a CHK and only for non-file usage. Anything
else we want to talk about before I repost?
--
Tom
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists