[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1393280598.11020.77.camel@joe-AO722>
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 14:23:18 -0800
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
James Morris <james.l.morris@...cle.com>,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/8] security: smack: Use a more current logging style
On Mon, 2014-02-24 at 14:16 -0800, Casey Schaufler wrote:
> On 2/24/2014 1:59 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
> > Convert printks to pr_<level>
> > Add pr_fmt.
> > diff --git a/security/smack/smack_lsm.c b/security/smack/smack_lsm.c
[]
> > +#define pr_fmt(fmt) KBUILD_MODNAME ": " fmt
> > +
>
> What is pr_fmt() for?
Prefixing "smack: " to the pr_<level> uses.
> > @@ -2106,8 +2108,7 @@ static int smack_inode_setsecurity(struct inode *inode, const char *name,
> > if (sock->sk->sk_family == PF_INET) {
> > rc = smack_netlabel(sock->sk, SMACK_CIPSO_SOCKET);
> > if (rc != 0)
> > - printk(KERN_WARNING
> > - "Smack: \"%s\" netlbl error %d.\n",
> > + pr_warn("\"%s\" netlbl error %d\n",
> > __func__, -rc);
This will be now be emitted as
<4>smack: "smack_inode_setsecurity" netlbl error -<d>
instead of
<4>Smack: "smack_inode_setsecurity" netlbl error -<d>
Though it'd be a lot more common to use:
pr_warn("%s: netlbl error: %d\n",
__func__, -rc);
so the output would be:
<4>smack: smack_inode_setsecurity: netlbl error: -<d>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists