[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140225033929.GP25940@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 12:39:29 +0900
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Nicolin Chen <Guangyu.Chen@...escale.com>
Cc: "Austin, Brian" <Brian.Austin@...rus.com>,
"Handrigan, Paul" <Paul.Handrigan@...rus.com>,
"robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"pawel.moll@....com" <pawel.moll@....com>,
"mark.rutland@....com" <mark.rutland@....com>,
"ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk" <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
"galak@...eaurora.org" <galak@...eaurora.org>,
"rob@...dley.net" <rob@...dley.net>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
"grant.likely@...aro.org" <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"alsa-devel@...a-project.org" <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: cs42888: Add codec driver support
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 11:13:14AM +0800, Nicolin Chen wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 12:09:47PM +0900, Mark Brown wrote:
> > We should be able to arrange to have the ESAI be a clock provider
> > shouldn't we? If the clocks need to interface to other things (and they
> > do) then we should be able to use the standard interface we have to
> > clocks.
> Excuse me, I think I just don't get the approach how to use clock API to
> standardize the MCLK derived from ESAI IP: it's surely not a fixed-clock
> so we couldn't register in DT and it's not SoC internal clock which means
> we couldn't register it in the SoC clock driver either.
> Could you please shed me some light on it?
So register it from the ESAI driver then.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists