linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 08/10] spi: sh-msiof: Move clock management to (un)prepare

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 24 Feb 2014 22:07:11 +0900
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc:	Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>,
	Takashi Yoshii <takasi-y@....dti.ne.jp>,
	linux-spi <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux-sh list <linux-sh@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...ux-m68k.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/10] spi: sh-msiof: Move clock management to
 (un)prepare_message()

On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 10:48:26AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:

> Perhaps it's because the bitbang core may call the .chipselect() callback
> multiple times with is_on == BITBANG_CS_ACTIVE, and obviously the
> clock should be enabled/disabled only once?
> The current code doesn't seem to do that, but perhaps it was different when
> the sh-msiof driver was written?

Possibly, or perhaps someone was being overly cautious.

> As you mention yourself, all of this code existed before. It just got moved,
> to make the conversion to the SPI core message handling easier.
> If you don't mind, I'd like to defer these, and tackle runtime PM later.

Sure.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)