[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1393311470-11526-1-git-send-email-acourbot@nvidia.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 15:57:50 +0900
From: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@...dia.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...aro.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Markus Pargmann <mpa@...gutronix.de>
CC: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <gnurou@...il.com>,
Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@...dia.com>
Subject: [PATCH] regulator: core: allow enabling without enable op
Commit 14c32a3ce6676265d7a27ea64a4d406e6dbad111 replaced direct uses of
ops->enable by calls to _regulator_do_enable. This prevents a fixed
regulators without a GPIO from being probed, since the former code
checked the existence of ops->enable and continued if it did not exist,
while _regulator_do_enable return -EINVAL in that case.
This patch fixes this by allowing _regulator_do_enable to go through
without error if ops->enable is not defined, similarly to what
_regulator_do_disable already does.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@...dia.com>
---
drivers/regulator/core.c | 2 --
1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/regulator/core.c b/drivers/regulator/core.c
index bdb12659dd41..4306422cee5d 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/core.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/core.c
@@ -1763,8 +1763,6 @@ static int _regulator_do_enable(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
ret = rdev->desc->ops->enable(rdev);
if (ret < 0)
return ret;
- } else {
- return -EINVAL;
}
/* Allow the regulator to ramp; it would be useful to extend
--
1.9.0
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists