[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140225085657.GA4746@osiris>
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 09:56:57 +0100
From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>
To: Tom Rini <trini@...com>
Cc: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] checkpatch.pl: Add warning for new __packed additions
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 05:04:57PM -0500, Tom Rini wrote:
> On 02/24/2014 05:02 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Mon, 2014-02-24 at 16:52 -0500, Tom Rini wrote:
> >> I've been lead to
> >> believe that most cases now people should be using regmap instead, which
> >> just leaves the case of having to match on-disk formats or similar cases
> >> I believe as the things that must stay __packed.
> >
> > __packed is also necessary for on-wire networking protocols.
>
> Indeed, and there's probably a few other valid cases I'm also
> forgetting. But the common case is hardware, where regmap is now preferred.
Except on s390 which doesn't use regmap. So this will give us a lot of false
positives with a warning message that isn't helpful at all.
It doesn't even tell us why it could be problematic and what would be the
better choice.
> I've got this modified to a CHK and only for non-file usage. Anything
> else we want to talk about before I repost?
/me thinks this patch should be dropped. It would cause too many false
positives, since there are lot of valid use cases for __packed.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists