linux-kernel - [PATCH 06/12] vfs: Add a function to lazily unmount all mounts from any dentry.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 25 Feb 2014 01:38:25 -0800
From:	ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To:	Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Cc:	"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>,
	Linux-Fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
	Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
	Karel Zak <kzak@...hat.com>,
	"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>,
	Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
Subject: [PATCH 06/12] vfs: Add a function to lazily unmount all mounts from any dentry.


The new function detach_mounts comes in two pieces.  The first piece
is a static inline test of d_mounpoint that returns immediately
without taking any locks if d_mounpoint is not set.  In the common
case when mountpoints are absent this allows the vfs to continue
running with it's same cacheline foot print.

The second piece of detach_mounts __detach_mounts actually does the
work and it assumes that a mountpoint is present so it is slow and
takes namespace_sem for write, and then locks the mount hash (aka
mount_lock) after a struct mountpoint has been found.

With those two locks held each entry on the list of mounts on a
mountpoint is selected and lazily unmounted until all of the mount
have been lazily unmounted.

v7: Wrote a proper change description and removed the changelog
    documenting deleted wrong turns.

Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederman@...tter.com>
---
 fs/mount.h     |    9 +++++++++
 fs/namespace.c |   31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/mount.h b/fs/mount.h
index 5375da0dc570..c5e717542bbc 100644
--- a/fs/mount.h
+++ b/fs/mount.h
@@ -84,6 +84,15 @@ extern struct mount *__lookup_mnt_last(struct vfsmount *, struct dentry *);
 
 extern bool legitimize_mnt(struct vfsmount *, unsigned);
 
+extern void __detach_mounts(struct dentry *dentry);
+
+static inline void detach_mounts(struct dentry *dentry)
+{
+	if (!d_mountpoint(dentry))
+		return;
+	__detach_mounts(dentry);
+}
+
 static inline void get_mnt_ns(struct mnt_namespace *ns)
 {
 	atomic_inc(&ns->count);
diff --git a/fs/namespace.c b/fs/namespace.c
index f2f03082fe70..52f4174e294c 100644
--- a/fs/namespace.c
+++ b/fs/namespace.c
@@ -1366,6 +1366,37 @@ static int do_umount(struct mount *mnt, int flags)
 	return retval;
 }
 
+/*
+ * __detach_mounts - lazily unmount all mounts on the specified dentry
+ *
+ * During unlink, rmdir, and d_drop it is possible to loose the path
+ * to an existing mountpoint, and wind up leaking the mount.
+ * detach_mounts allows lazily unmounting those mounts instead of
+ * leaking them.
+ * 
+ * The caller may hold dentry->d_inode->i_mutex.
+ */
+void __detach_mounts(struct dentry *dentry)
+{
+	struct mountpoint *mp;
+	struct mount *mnt;
+
+	namespace_lock();
+	mp = lookup_mountpoint(dentry);
+	if (!mp)
+		goto out_unlock;
+
+	lock_mount_hash();
+	while (!list_empty(&mp->m_list)) {
+		mnt = list_first_entry(&mp->m_list, struct mount, mnt_mp_list);
+		umount_tree(mnt, 2);
+	}
+	unlock_mount_hash();
+	put_mountpoint(mp);
+out_unlock:
+	namespace_unlock();
+}
+
 /* 
  * Is the caller allowed to modify his namespace?
  */
-- 
1.7.5.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/