linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v8 01/14] mfd: omap-usb-host: Get clocks based on hardware revision

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <530C6506.5050607@ti.com>
Date:	Tue, 25 Feb 2014 11:40:22 +0200
From:	Roger Quadros <rogerq@...com>
To:	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
CC:	<tony@...mide.com>, <bcousson@...libre.com>, <balbi@...com>,
	<nm@...com>, <khilman@...aro.org>, <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>, Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 01/14] mfd: omap-usb-host: Get clocks based on hardware
 revision

On 02/25/2014 11:37 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
>> Not all revisions have all the clocks so get the necessary clocks
>> based on hardware revision.
>>
>> This should avoid un-necessary clk_get failure messages that were
>> observed earlier.
>>
>> CC: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
>> CC: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Roger Quadros <rogerq@...com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/mfd/omap-usb-host.c | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
>>  1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> 
> What about patches 1 and 2. Are these safe to go in alone?
> 
patch 6 must not go in without 1. I've just asked Mike if we can squash it into 1.

patch 2 can go alone.

cheers,
-roger
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/