[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140225113848.GO9987@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 12:38:48 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, will.deacon@....com,
dave.martin@....com, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/7] perf: kill perf_event_context_type
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 05:44:20PM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote:
> Currently perf_event_context::type is used to determine whether a
> context is cpu-bound or task-bound. However perf_event_context::task can
> be used to determine this just as cheaply, and requires no additional
> initialisation.
>
> This patch removes perf_event_context::type, and modifies existing users
> to check check perf_event_context::task instead. The now unused enum
> perf_event_context_type is removed.
> @@ -7130,7 +7129,7 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE5(perf_event_open,
> * task or CPU context:
> */
> if (move_group) {
> - if (group_leader->ctx->type != ctx->type)
> + if (group_leader->ctx->task != ctx->task)
> goto err_context;
> } else {
> if (group_leader->ctx != ctx)
That's not an equivalent statement. ctx->task (t1) != ctx->task (t2)
while they're still both of the same type.
Now I don't think you'll ever end up with different tasks in this case
so it might still work out; but you don't mention this and I'd have to
like think to make sure.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists