lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 25 Feb 2014 18:46:42 +0530
From:	Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>
Cc:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: put rq's sched_avg under CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED

> The struct sched_avg of struct rq is only used in case group
> scheduling is enabled inside __update_tg_runnable_avg() to update
> per-cpu representation of a task group.  I.e. that there is no need to
> maintain the runnable avg of a rq in the !CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED case.
> 
> This patch guards struct sched_avg of struct rq and
> update_rq_runnable_avg() with CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED.
> 

While this patch looks good, I see fields in sched_avg viz decay_count,
last_runnable_update, load_avg_contrib  only relevant to sched_entity.
i.e they don't seem to be updated or used for rq->avg. Should we look at
splitting sched_avg so that rq->avg doesn't have unwanted fields?

--
Thanks and Regards
Srikar Dronamraju

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ