[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <D8A6682F-CC21-4428-AFA3-C50FBA8ED1F7@holtmann.org>
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 09:59:07 -0800
From: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
Cc: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
Rhyland Klein <rklein@...dia.com>,
Marc Dietrich <marvin24@....de>,
Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>,
"linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org Wireless"
<linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 0/5] net: rfkill: gpio: cleanup and a few new acpi ids
Hi Johannes,
>> I was waiting for the DT support from Chen-Yu before sending these,
>> but decided it makes no difference when I send them. I'm dropping the
>> con ID in the second patch because Dan noticed the warning, but of
>> course it will mean the "gpios" property can be used with DT.
>>
>> The two last patches just add ACPI IDs for some new Baytrail based
>> boards.
>
> Do these patches have any dependencies, or should I just add them to the
> mac80211-next tree (since I don't keep a separate rfkill tree)?
>
> Or does anyone else want to take them? In that case, it's all fine with
> me, I'm really just nominally the rfkill maintainer and have no idea
> about these patches... :)
someone has to take them. So I say go for it.
Regards
Marcel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists