[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1332921457.30140.1393357561516.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 19:46:01 +0000 (UTC)
From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
To: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Anil S Keshavamurthy <anil.s.keshavamurthy@...el.com>,
Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ibm.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [BUG kretprobes] kretprobe triggers General Protection Faults
Hi,
I had a bug report[1] from a user trying to add a kretprobe on the system
call entry code path:
arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S:
ffffffff813dffe2 <system_call_fastpath+0x16>:
cmpl $__NR_syscall_max,%eax
#endif
ja badsys
movq %r10,%rcx
call *sys_call_table(,%rax,8) # XXX: rip relative
movq %rax,RAX-ARGOFFSET(%rsp) <--- return address pointing here
And all hell breaks loose (various types of faults, machine reboots,
applications exit randomly, etc.). I understand that this code path
is not marked as unsafe against kprobes, and I tested that a kprobes
indeed works fine there. However, kretprobes probably presumes a function
stack layout that is just not valid for the syscall entry routine.
Any thoughts on how kretprobes should handle this ?
Thanks,
Mathieu
[1] http://bugs.lttng.org/issues/687
--
Mathieu Desnoyers
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists