[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1393386338.29388.5.camel@concordia>
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 14:45:38 +1100
From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
Cc: Deepthi Dharwar <deepthi@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
Wang Dongsheng <dongsheng.wang@...escale.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
Cody P Schafer <cody@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc: warn users of smt-snooze-delay that the API
isn't there anymore
On Wed, 2014-02-26 at 09:40 +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-02-25 at 13:29 +0530, Deepthi Dharwar wrote:
> > We currently do not use smt-snooze-delay in the kernel.
> > The sysfs entries needs to be retained until we do a clean up
> > ppc64_cpu
> > util that uses these entries to determine SMT,
> > clean up patch for this has already been posted out by Prerna.
> > Once, we have the ppc64_cpu changes in, we can look to clean up these
> > parts from the kernel.
>
> We generally shouldn't change user visible interfaces.
>
> People still have old versions of ppc64_cpu, we must not break them
Yeah we can't remove the file entirely, at least for a few more years.
ppc64_cpu should never have used that file to determine if a cpu existed, but
it did, so we're stuck with it.
What we can do is remove the unused percpu, and just leave the file in sysfs,
and have it print a warning when anyone touches it.
cheers
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists