linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/6] gpio / ACPI: Embed events list directly into struct acpi_gpio

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 26 Feb 2014 11:10:01 +0200
From:	Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
To:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Cc:	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
	Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>,
	Lan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@...el.com>,
	Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@...el.com>, Alan Cox <alan.cox@...el.com>,
	Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@...ux.intel.com>,
	linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] gpio / ACPI: Embed events list directly into struct
 acpi_gpio_chip

On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 03:26:12PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Monday, February 24, 2014 06:00:09 PM Mika Westerberg wrote:
> > It is not necessary to have events as a pointer to list in struct
> > acpi_gpio_chip. Instead we can embed the list_head directly to struct
> > acpi_gpio_chip itself. This makes event handling a bit simpler because now
> > we don't need to check whether the pointer is NULL or not.
> 
> It looks like I should have reviewed the whole series before commenting [2/6].
> 
> Well, my modified comment would be "Why don't you fold this one into [2/6]?", then.

I will in the next version, thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/