[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140226001407.GM2927@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 09:14:07 +0900
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@....ocn.ne.jp>
Cc: iivanov@...sol.com, gsi@...x.de, linux-spi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] spi: core: Validate length of the transfers in message
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 10:55:28PM +0900, Atsushi Nemoto wrote:
> Is xfer->len == 0 invalid?
> Long time ago I have fixed atmel spi driver to support zero length
> transfer (commit 06719814 atmel_spi: support zero length transfer).
> According to Documentation/spi/spi-summary, zeto length transfer seems
> valid.
> + optionally defining short delays after transfers ... using
> the spi_transfer.delay_usecs setting (this delay can be the
> only protocol effect, if the buffer length is zero);
*sigh* I guess it is valid, though frankly I'm concerned that this
isn't a good idea - it's certainly not going to work reliably given the
need for every driver to open code this, most of them get the delay
stuff wrong.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists