linux-kernel - Re: + mm-revert-thp-make-madv_hugepage-check-for-mm-def

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140226153144.GA15527@redhat.com>
Date:	Wed, 26 Feb 2014 16:31:44 +0100
From:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To:	Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>
Cc:	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, schwidefsky@...ibm.com,
	rientjes@...gle.com, riel@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org,
	pbonzini@...hat.com, mingo@...nel.org, mgorman@...e.de,
	kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com, heiko.carstens@...ibm.com,
	hannes@...xchg.org, gerald.schaefer@...ibm.com,
	ebiederm@...ssion.com, aarcange@...hat.com, athorlton@....com
Subject: Re: + mm-revert-thp-make-madv_hugepage-check-for-mm-def_flags.patch
	added to -mm tree

On 02/26, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>
> On 26/02/14 15:50, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> >
> > But perhaps qemu can be changed to avoid MADV_HUGEPAGE on s390 ?
> > Otherwise I'd suggest the change below.
> >
> > Oleg.
> >
> >
> > --- x/mm/huge_memory.c
> > +++ x/mm/huge_memory.c
> > @@ -1968,8 +1968,6 @@ out:
> >  int hugepage_madvise(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> >  		     unsigned long *vm_flags, int advice)
> >  {
> > -	struct mm_struct *mm = vma->vm_mm;
> > -
> >  	switch (advice) {
> >  	case MADV_HUGEPAGE:
> >  		/*
> > @@ -1977,8 +1975,16 @@ int hugepage_madvise(struct vm_area_stru
> >  		 */
> >  		if (*vm_flags & (VM_HUGEPAGE | VM_NO_THP))
> >  			return -EINVAL;
> > -		if (mm->def_flags & VM_NOHUGEPAGE)
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * MADV_HUGEPAGE after PRCTL_THP_DISABLE is broken on s390 because
> > + * qemu blindly does madvise(MADV_HUGEPAGE) after s390_enable_sie().
> > + */
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_S390
> > +		if (vma->vm_mm->def_flags & VM_NOHUGEPAGE)
> >  			return -EINVAL;
> > +#endif
> > +
>
> Ifdefs are ugly but might be the only way of not breaking existing userspace.

Yes, agreed. but note that this code is already s390-specific, nobody
else puts VM_NOHUGEPAGE into ->def_flags (until this series of course).

> If we come up with a solution for THP in KVM host processes on s390, we can
> then remove that wart. We could even limit that hack to KVM only processes
> to retain Alex' prctl capability by checking mm_has_pgste

Yes, yes, I looked at mm->context.has_pgste too ;) But I wasn't sure
we can rely on it. Thanks.

> > +/*
> > + * MADV_HUGEPAGE after PRCTL_THP_DISABLE is broken on s390 because
> > + * qemu blindly does madvise(MADV_HUGEPAGE) after s390_enable_sie().
> > + */
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_S390
> > +		if ((vma->vm_mm->def_flags & VM_NOHUGEPAGE) && mm_has_pgste(vma->vm_mm))
> >  			return -EINVAL;

Hmm... but why do we need to check VM_NOHUGEPAGE then? Can't the
change below work?

Oleg.

--- x/arch/s390/mm/pgtable.c
+++ x/arch/s390/mm/pgtable.c
@@ -1084,7 +1084,6 @@ static inline void thp_split_mm(struct m
 		vma->vm_flags &= ~VM_HUGEPAGE;
 		vma->vm_flags |= VM_NOHUGEPAGE;
 	}
-	mm->def_flags |= VM_NOHUGEPAGE;
 }
 #else
 static inline void thp_split_mm(struct mm_struct *mm)
--- x/mm/huge_memory.c
+++ x/mm/huge_memory.c
@@ -1968,8 +1968,6 @@ out:
 int hugepage_madvise(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
 		     unsigned long *vm_flags, int advice)
 {
-	struct mm_struct *mm = vma->vm_mm;
-
 	switch (advice) {
 	case MADV_HUGEPAGE:
 		/*
@@ -1977,8 +1975,12 @@ int hugepage_madvise(struct vm_area_stru
 		 */
 		if (*vm_flags & (VM_HUGEPAGE | VM_NO_THP))
 			return -EINVAL;
-		if (mm->def_flags & VM_NOHUGEPAGE)
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_S390
+		if (mm_has_pgste(vma->vm_mm))
 			return -EINVAL;
+#endif
+
 		*vm_flags &= ~VM_NOHUGEPAGE;
 		*vm_flags |= VM_HUGEPAGE;
 		/*

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/