[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <530D3102.60504@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 16:10:42 -0800
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
To: Alexander Graf <agraf@...e.de>
CC: "linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Izik Eidus <izik.eidus@...ellosystems.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ksm: Expose configuration via sysctl
On 02/25/2014 03:09 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>> Couldn't we also (maybe in parallel) just teach the sysctl userspace
>> about sysfs? This way we don't have to do parallel sysctls and sysfs
>> for *EVERYTHING* in the kernel:
>>
>> sysfs.kernel.mm.transparent_hugepage.enabled=enabled
>
> It's pretty hard to filter this. We definitely do not want to expose all of sysfs through /proc/sys. But how do we know which files are actual configuration and which ones are dynamic system introspection data?
>
> We could add a filter, but then we can just as well stick with the manual approach I followed here :).
Maybe not stick it under /proc/sys, but teach sysctl(8) about them. I
guess at the moment, sysctl says that it's tied to /proc/sys:
> DESCRIPTION
> sysctl is used to modify kernel parameters at runtime. The parameters available are those listed under /proc/sys/. Procfs is required
> for sysctl support in Linux. You can use sysctl to both read and write sysctl data.
But surely that's not set in stone just because the manpage says so. :)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists