[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140227000153.GC18555@sgi.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 18:01:53 -0600
From: Alex Thorlton <athorlton@....com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
schwidefsky@...ibm.com, rientjes@...gle.com, riel@...hat.com,
pbonzini@...hat.com, mingo@...nel.org, mgorman@...e.de,
kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com, heiko.carstens@...ibm.com,
hannes@...xchg.org, gerald.schaefer@...ibm.com,
ebiederm@...ssion.com, aarcange@...hat.com
Subject: Re: + mm-revert-thp-make-madv_hugepage-check-for-mm-def_flags.patch
added to -mm tree
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 03:24:34PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Feb 2014 13:39:17 -0600 Alex Thorlton <athorlton@....com> wrote:
>
> > >
> > >
> > > > I'd suggest the patch below on top of your changes, but I won't argue.
> >
> > I like this approach, and your updated comment as well. This should
> > probably go in as [PATCH 2/4] in my series. Do I need to spin a v5
> > with this new patch included in the series, or will Andrew pull this in?
>
> Paolo's comments on Oleg's patch remain unaddressed, so please take a
> look at that and send out the final version?
Got it. I'll get that to you tonight/tomorrow morning.
> An incremental patch would be preferred, please. I'll later fold that
> into mm-revert-thp-make-madv_hugepage-check-for-mm-def_flags.patch to
> avoid any bisection holes.
Understood. I'll keep them separate.
Thanks, Andrew!
- Alex
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists